Jan Waclawek <konf...@efton.sk> wrote: >>Sure, it depends from sizeof(int).
> Hummm, for me, the relationship is not quite "sure". Can you explain > that in more detail, please? An array is implicitly (without the option to change it) indexed by type `int'. Not `unsigned int', it's `int' -- because negative indices are explicitly allowed (e.g. to access the previous array element through a pointer like "a[-1]"). I'm not quite sure why GCC doesn't accept more than __INT_MAX__ *bytes* (as opposed to array elements); perhaps it internally aliases everything to bytes. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
