On 23/06/2010 04:11, matt.vandewer...@csiro.au wrote:
Ubuntu 10.04 has avr-gcc and avr-libc to the same patch level as
winavr, AFAIK. Apart from that, better editors, better shell, better
serial terminal support, makes for a better avr experience IMO. The
only downside is that you have to write your own Makefiles, but I do
that anyway.
That's good to hear. I haven't tried avr-gcc on my Ubuntu machine as
yet - partly because it's important be consistent about releases of the
compiler and library, and using WinAVR is a very easy way to keep these
things consistent.
I know this is a little off-topic, but perhaps it's of interest to
others in this thread - what do you use for serial terminals, since you
mentioned them? I've only used minicom so far. It works, but it's like
a step back to the DOS days compared to Tera Term Pro on windows.
mvh.,
David
Le 07/06/2010 18:13, Graham Davies a écrit :
Me Again: Actually, it's so easy now that I have a hard time
imagining it being easier. The only tricky thing is that you can't
install WinAVR to a path that has a space character in it, such as
"Program Files", but even that doesn't bite me as I nLite my
Windows installations so that programs install to a folder called
"Programs". Even my customers seem to be able to install AVR Studio
and WinAVR to work together without a hitch.
It's still tricky to have WinAVR quality on Linux, I hope the next
tool/organization will also package a WinAVR quality gcc for
Linux...
Bernard
_______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing
list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
