On Thursday 02 April 2009 00:46, Weddington, Eric wrote: > I don't see a real need to have the separate *.ctype section, do you?. We > should just have .text.avr-libc and .text.avr-libc.fplib.
Seems, it is not needed. Likely, this is from time, when a short branches was used between ctype modules. This was corrected a few years ago. > This is a good snippet, but where would you integrate this? This is for > both gcc (libgcc), and for avr-libc. These projects need to build with > these default sections. I'd rather not have a post-build script that would > have to be documented somewhere, because people building other > distributions will want this too. I do not know. However, it can be demanded only for experienced users. Perhaps, it is possible to be limited to a FAQ note? Also I can think how to change Avr-libc rules for automatic renaming at compile time. I have a small positive experience in changing of rules with patch #6718 (optimize EEPROM). Regards, Dmitry. P.S. For commiting of patch #6718 there are no only test with real Xmega. Eric, have you any possibility to do this? _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
