Haven't tested it, however I can see how the C++ version would work. I'd
argue that the version maintaining the same API as the C version should be
the one adopted, since different APIs for C and C++ are a bad thing.
- Dean
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Joerg Wunsch" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 6:23 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: bug #22163 (atomic not working as expected in C++)
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?22163
The bug looks serious enough to me so I'd like to include David's
alternative C++ implementation. Did anyone else test this? Any
objections?
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
