As Weddington, Eric wrote: > I have to emphatically agree with Joerg on all of this.
I wrote a preamble that is displayed for any new patch tracker items, and added a reference to my mailing list article there. (The article isn't archived yet, so I made a guess about its article number. Will correct it if necessary, as soon as it actually appeared in the archives.) > Unless there are any immediate objections, I will be preparing a > patch to remove these additional progmem.h features. I'm neutral to this. I don't mind it being in to encourage Jan of completing the patch submission, and provide the documentation later on. However, as you've been applying the patch, Eric, it's of course your decision about keeping it or not. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
