As Bill Perry wrote: > The only thing left (for me) is the possibility of adding a > _delay_ns() function.
Are you willing to submit that as a patch against the current SVN version? If so, please don't forget the documentation (which is just the doxygen comment on top of it). The documentation should clearly point out the limits in the applicability of this function, so it's immediately obvious that nobody could expect a 12.5 ns delay on a CPU clocked with 1 MHz. ;-) -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
