> Sure. :-) I haven't had a chance to review the links yet... > > But what did you have in mind?
It's to provide users an easy way to place potentially big constant data explicitly into the upper portions of FLASH in the >64kB . Honestly, I know this is a thing which would help only a minority of AVR users, and quite a bit of unpleasant organisational work (e.g. pestering the binutil peoplpe), so I expected it to be entirely ignored by the developer community exactly as it happened since the last time I threw it up. So, if the precondition to accept it is a discussion on this forum, then it won't be accepted ever simply because there's nobody willing to discuss. While I know all this and honestly don't care enough to push it further, recently, several things happened: two users asked basically for the same feature on AVRFreaks on the same day, one complained about the nonfunctionality of the _PF stuff (I reported elsewhere), Johann told that there is a chance of getting the named spaces to work in a relatively near future (with the aim to implement the progmem stuff correctly, which is a point where the far-progmem stuff might got to be implemented correctly, too), and you told that you are going to issue a new edition of WinAVR soon. Cumulatively, these gave me the impulse to make this post. Jan Waclawek _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
