Thanks for getting back. No doubt avr-libc is deployed in an incredible quantity of devices these days, not the least of which is driven by it being the foundation for Arduino.
Judging by the mailing list archives, it seems there is quite a bit of pent-up demand for minor enhancements, but it does not look like the 2.0.0 version has been touched in a few years. What is the route to becoming an allowed committer — if I or someone has time to help out with this? Anyways — the thing that sparked this particularly inquiry is an idea for an enhancement which I will send to this list under separate cover. If it’s an idea worthy of consideration, I’ll submit a patch, in the hopes that it can become merged with upstream. Thanks, Taavo. > On Jan 21, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Joerg Wunsch <[email protected]> wrote: > > As Taavo Raykoff wrote: > >> Is there any active maintainer on avr-libc? > > Depends on your definition of "active". > > I am the maintainer of it, but unfortunately, even though my activity > is very low (being busy in many respects, family, job, German amateur > radio league, other opensource stuff as well), I don't know of anyone > being more active than me - even though the list of allowed committers > is quite a bit longer. > > -- > cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL > > http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ > Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
