On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Tomaž Šolc <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/21/2011 12:07 PM, Renato Caldas wrote: >> Just one thing though: I've noticed that most parts have common >> config lines that get repeated all over the place. I opted to just >> clone an existing config and modify the things I needed. Was this a >> good approach? Do I really need all that stuff in there? > > Hi Renato
Hi Tomaz, Thank you for the reply! > There's a patch sitting in the bug tracker that makes it possible to > reuse common config lines from an existing part. > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?34302 > > If it's going to be applied, then I guess it would be better for new > chip definitions to start using that syntax. Good news then. For now I guess I will submit this patch as-is to the bug tracker, mostly as a placeholder. As soon as #34302 is applied and sorted out I will submit a second patch using the new syntax. I also created a texi/info patch for the m32m1. But if patch #7687 is being applied before the next release, I guess there's no need for it. Cheers, Renato > Best regards > Tomaž > > _______________________________________________ > avrdude-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev _______________________________________________ avrdude-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev
