Follow-up Comment #12, bug #41857 (project avrdude): First of all, 8 lines are simple. Second, in my opinion sending SIG-TERM to a process should not be the normal way to end it in error cases. No, I do not have a stk500 but jtagICE II does not time out.
NO, the erase cycle duration does not depend on the clock rate. As I wrote before it is "7.3ms - 8.9ms per page" (values copied from the datasheet). More information about flash erase can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memory The only clock rate dependent operation is to increase the page counter. "So if choosing this fix, it should be deployed to at least avr910 also." I do not have the any avr910 based system, so I can not test it. If you have such devices: feel free to do so. "Whould be a nice improvement for the old protocol." NO, it will cause in compatibility with other software like avr-studio. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?41857> _______________________________________________ Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah http://savannah.nongnu.org/ _______________________________________________ avrdude-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avrdude-dev
