[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Lipcon updated AVRO-258:
-----------------------------
Attachment: simple-genned.avpr
simple.avpr
AVRO-258.txt
Here's a patch that shows what works so far. It does not include proper unit
tests yet, but you can try it like so:
{noformat}
$ ant compile-java
$ java -cp build/lib/*:build/classes/ org.apache.avro.genavro.GenAvro <
src/test/genavro/simple.avpr
{noformat}
I also attached input and output for a schema basically the same as the
test/schemata/simple.avpr
Certainly more work to be done here, but I want to get feedback from the
community before I spend the time to get it properly tested, documented,
corner-cases worked out, etc. Most importantly, is this something people want?
Does this style of syntax seem reasonable?
> Higher-level language for authoring schemata
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-258
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-258
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: spec
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Assignee: Todd Lipcon
> Attachments: AVRO-258.txt, simple-genned.avpr, simple.avpr
>
>
> Early users of Avro have noted that authoring schemas and especially
> protocols in JSON feels unnatural. This JIRA is to work on a higher-level
> language that feels more like defining interfaces and classes in Java/C/etc.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
