Hey Chad, Yep, I used the term "Raw Sockets" inappropriately. I added a comment to the JIRA. Feel free to comment on the JIRA next time.
Regards, Jeff On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Chad Harrington <chad.harring...@gmail.com > wrote: > Jeff, > First off, congrats on being made a committer. You're doing a great job > with the Python implementation. > > Secondly, I have a question about your use of the term 'raw sockets'. Do > you mean: > > 1. TCP sockets w/o HTTP or any other layer 7 protocol > 2. Actual raw sockets, which do not use TCP at all ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raw_socket, > http://mixter.void.ru/rawip.html > ) > > I think you mean #1, but the term generally means #2. > > Thanks again for your hard work, > > Chad Harrington > chad.harring...@gmail.com > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher (JIRA) > <j...@apache.org>wrote: > > > > > [ > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12799943#action_12799943 > ] > > > > Jeff Hammerbacher commented on AVRO-321: > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > Question: should interop tests use raw sockets or HTTP as a transport, or > > both? > > > > > Run Java RPC interop tests again > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > Key: AVRO-321 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-321 > > > Project: Avro > > > Issue Type: Test > > > Components: build, java > > > Reporter: Jeff Hammerbacher > > > Fix For: 1.3.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > - > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > > >
