[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12800966#action_12800966 ]
Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-334: ----------------------------------- > In our experience, http servers are too black-box for the kinds of things we > want to do [ ... ] That sounds reasonable. I'd like to avoid defining more than one Avro-specific wire protocol, and hope we can devise one that is simple, permits high-performance implementations, and also permits secure implementations. In the meantime, I think we're better off using HTTP. If you have existing client/server stacks, it should be fairly trivial to send Avro-format requests and responses over them. Meanwhile, the Avro reference implementations and specification will only have HTTP clients and servers until we standardize on another. Is that draconian? > If possible, do not close the socket after every request in > sample_ipc_server.py > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AVRO-334 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-334 > Project: Avro > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: python > Reporter: Jeff Hammerbacher > > See > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2066810/does-the-tcpserver-baserequesthandler-in-pythons-socketserver-close-the-socket -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.