[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12800966#action_12800966
]
Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-334:
-----------------------------------
> In our experience, http servers are too black-box for the kinds of things we
> want to do [ ... ]
That sounds reasonable. I'd like to avoid defining more than one Avro-specific
wire protocol, and hope we can devise one that is simple, permits
high-performance implementations, and also permits secure implementations. In
the meantime, I think we're better off using HTTP.
If you have existing client/server stacks, it should be fairly trivial to send
Avro-format requests and responses over them. Meanwhile, the Avro reference
implementations and specification will only have HTTP clients and servers until
we standardize on another. Is that draconian?
> If possible, do not close the socket after every request in
> sample_ipc_server.py
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-334
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: python
> Reporter: Jeff Hammerbacher
>
> See
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2066810/does-the-tcpserver-baserequesthandler-in-pythons-socketserver-close-the-socket
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
