[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861935#action_12861935
]
Scott Carey commented on AVRO-530:
----------------------------------
Some of it was in this conversation:
http://www.mail-archive.com/avro-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg02397.html
I agree the JSON could certainly be easier to use in several ways. But those
are spec changes that are not backwards compatible. Maybe Avro 2.0?
> allow for mutual recursion in type definitions
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-530
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-530
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: spec
> Affects Versions: 1.3.2
> Reporter: Jeff Hodges
>
> Suppose you have these two types in your protocol:
> {code}
> {"name": "User", "type": "record", "fields": [{"name": "current_status",
> "type": "Status"}]}
> {"name": "Status", "type": "record", "fields": [{"name": "author", "type":
> "User"}]}
> {code}
> This will raise an error! The current workaround is to define one of them at
> their first usage. Like:
> {code}
> {"name": "User", "type": "record", "fields": [{"name": "current_status",
> "type": {"name": "Status", "type": "record", "fields": [.. lots of fields
> ...]}]}
> {code}
> But this is incredibly unwieldy. It would be really nice for the spec to
> require all the parsers to allow for mutual recursion, instead. It could be
> done by implementing a two-pass parser. One pass to acquire names referenced,
> and a second to fill in those names with their appropriate references.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
