Thanks a lot. And, err, Broomstick, not Broomhill, sorry for that, Broomhill only works with Molestick, which doesn't exist. Which product will be supported the longest, A3D 3.6, or A3DLite ? Which one will allow for a painless switch to Broomstick, when FP11 becomes the current stable Flash Player ? Thanks, C++
________________________________ De : richardolsson <r...@richardolsson.se> À : Away3D.dev <away3d-dev@googlegroups.com> Envoyé le : Mardi 7 Juin 2011 17h40 Objet : [away3d] Re: which version of Away3d should I use ? If you compile something using Broomstick it will not run in player versions below 11. You will need to stick to Away3D 3.6 (or Away3D lite) if you want to create content for Flash Player 10. Cheers /R On Jun 7, 4:51 pm, Achim Bloch <achim.bl...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Hi, > I need to setup 3d histograms, and I am wondering which version of Away3d is > best for me ? > We usually target Flash Player 10, so I first thought Away3D 3.6 was good for > us, but will I run into trouble if I choose Broomhill instead, but don't use > the specific functions targeted at Flash Player 11 (incubator) ? Will my > components (based on Cube Primitives) show properly in FP10 ? > Thanks in advance, > Cyrill
