-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1244286306 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
>> I'm currently trying to make my config work with current master. One thing I
>> found: awful.widget.graph and .progressbar don't offer the same features
>> their C
>> counterparts had. I'll see if I write some patches on this...
>
> Like ?
>
>> Let's see which other patches I will come up with... (Anyone wants to enhance
>> awful.widget.*? vertical progressbars and graphs with more than one graph
>> sound
>> like a goal (I use one graph which shows used mem and caches/buffers at the
>> same
>> time))
>
> No no no, do not rewrite that crap again. Wants more graph on top of
> each other? Use a widget layout. :-)
And if I want this now and not in 6 months? Plus this wouldnt work since graphs
aren't transparent AFAIK. Well, ok, I guess I dont really need the memory used
for caches...
So, what's up with the patches I posted?
- --
"Do you know that books smell like nutmeg or some spice from a foreign land?"
-- Faber in Fahrenheit 451
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJKKpHjAAoJECLkKOvLj8sGxT4H/120mPVSJGknBw/27BjUEo6o
6Py66bre9jOspu5OuFzI0DN4kPWWjLsXBuP2aMBm/nbMA9NsCuXTcmjBIpdN64P7
DKaP48MXjO2mAIq6rzax6DP8bZLmLpReOpvi1ry02sgjUdFYSkf/Xh0Tegf/bYHt
gSKEToj8rQLhble4zU7+slFtWgayWw4pX+rPJ++GCgj3L6baU5vrK15ah6gAHm8J
KihvsQ08YHCt//O4Sm4mvGJ+QoPfvdObAELNK47HPXes8NXaVYb2NhGouLB6yYBn
6H2GlsARppcbfjW22IyN1fp+QHdBuCMFvk3Upe+54qsa+gRB4vF90U5jsvUpe0U=
=Qsko
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-devel-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
