At 1252396135 time_t, Julien Danjou wrote: > Yeah, actually, that sounds like a good idea. That have to be designed > correctly, but it means we should handle wiboxes like normal managed clients.
Well, I was just thinking about some other problems we'll have. I use this thread as a note taking paper. :) This needs much more works than we think. Because all operations doable on clients should be then doable on a managed-wibox. That means tagging it, that means setting it maximized, etc. Maybe wibox should be just clients? The whole things sounds like a big API redesign. -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ <jul...@danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // Trust me.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
