At 1254780162 time_t, lukash wrote: > On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:57:10 +0200 (CEST) Julien Danjou > <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > > > It is more complicated :) If you make resizing to all available space > > > default, > > > and put this horizontal.leftright into a vertical.topdown, > > > horizontal.leftright > > > would take all vertical space and nothing under it could be drawn. > > > > Of course you can, that's the point of topdown. > > I don't understand?
Let me be clearer. If you don't want to take all the vertical space, so you can put other widgets under a row, you just use the topdown layout so you can put another row of widget. In anyway, the height should be max() of all widgets height in a row. > Ok, please try to remove the height = wibox.height from the default > rc.lua and see what happens. Then you can propose your own solution :) I'll try, I just imagine it does not take the full height. But that's not the layout work to try to resize widgets. > Regarding resizing, I can see at least one case where almost every user > will want the image resized, and thats the client icons. Everyone will > set different height of his panel and will want the icons scaled so > that they take up exactly the height of his panel. So in this case it's just a matter of setting the widget height. > > No, the height is defined by the maximum height of all widget in a row > > (for horizontal). > > Thats how my layouts behave if you don't set the height. Ok, so, that's perfect. (I admit I did not have time to proof read the code and check that). > Yes, I definately aggree, but you also need to make sure the wheel fits > your Ferrari. I haven't seen GTK layouts, will do so when I have time, > but without knowing much of how it works and what it can do, I think > there are some differences in what awesome needs and what GTK does. In > awesome you want to have pixel precision to set the widgets the way you > want, sometimes scale them to take up all the space (I suppose, yeah). That's almost the same in GTK+. > I see we might gonna have another argument, so lets have it on IRC > tomorrow, so that we don't spam the ML :D. To give you an idea of what > I'm trying to do, here's a screenshot of my unfinished panel: > http://omploader.org/vMmhtNA. See that I want the icons scaled up to > 48px. (I'd also like awesome to use the higher resolution icons from > the WM hints or how is it called :)) Seems nice, indeed. I don't see the problem of the scaling, can you elaborate? Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ <jul...@danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // Don't give up.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
