Hello, On 10/01/13 04:46:50 +0100, Uli Schlachter wrote: > On 10.01.2013 01:32, Ignas Anikevičius wrote: > > One is about the issue of systray making awesome crash if user's rc.lua > > is invalid. This was brought up by Manuel Kasser. I commented the > > systray out with some commentary why it is done. > > Hm. Everyone who just uses the default config will hate you for this. Unless > we > don't come up with a better fix, I'd just go with the attached patch which > remove the multiple-systray-check. People who add more than one systray to > their > wibox deserve what they get anyway. > > What do you think? What do others think? Can we get some good ideas, please? >
I think it's a much better idea actually. It's just the thing is I don't know how the fallback mechanism in Awesome works and whether the modules are loaded again when the user rc.lua is invalid and the /etc/xdg/awesome/rc.lua is read from the top. If my logic is correct here, this check in the module might not work. Am I thinking wrong? Cheers, Ignas -- To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-devel-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
