On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:02:06AM +0000, Nikos Ntarmos wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 01:59:56AM +0200, Nikos Ntarmos wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I just stumbled upon this and thought I'd better ask here to save some
> > time digging around the gperf internals. FreeBSD (for which I'm the port
> > maintainer) has a gperf executable in the base system, identified as GNU
> > gperf 2.7.2 in the 7-STABLE branch. There is also the devel/gperf port,
> > containing GNU gperf 3.0.3. I'd like to keep the dependencies as low as
> > possible for our package so I tried to generate tokenize.{c,h} with the
> > base version. To start with, it required an extra -D argument as there
> > were a couple of "duplicate" symbols. Now, the resulting .h file is
> > identical among the two versions, but the (attached) .c file is
> > obviously different. I'm running a version with the attached tokenize.c
> > file. Can one of you gperf gurus out there see something notably wrong
> > with it?
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> > \n\n
>
> .... and the attachments... I'm testing the v2.7.2 one right now, which
> is the one I'd ideally like to keep. However, I'm afraid of losing some
> functionality somewhere. Not that I've seen something different so far.You won't lose anything, just have a slightly less efficient lookup in the worst case scenario, which you don't care about. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [email protected] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpmkcOoiFQPo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
