> > Interesting, I didn't know that. Do you have any pointers to documents > > about this? Would be interesting for me to see how that works. > > Intuitively I would have assumed that the bytecode level locking would > > be more efficient than method calls. I know these are intrinsics, but > > still ... how can those be *more* efficient? Just curious... > > This was recently asked on the concurrency-discuss list: > http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2010-November/007491.html > > > Does synchronized still have a better internal implementation over > > j.u.c.Lock as this old blog entry says - > > > http://blogs.sun.com/dave/entry/java_util_concurrent_reentrantlock_vs ? > > > > The scales have shifted back and forth, but it's not something to > worry > about at this point.
Ha! The one list I am not subscribed to ;-) Is there a way to bulk-subscribe to all lists? I'd rather get lots of traffic from one list and filter this than track millions of lists with almost no traffic. Cheers, Roman
