On 02/10/12 03:58 AM, Michael Barker wrote:
Hi Stuart,

Thank you for the reviewing the patches.  I forgot about the
Contributed-by header, sorry about that.  That's one I'll put on the
list to make sure I have sorted next time.  I've split the
contributors up according to the two patches supplied.   See below:

AWT, beans&  printing:

To close the loop on this, I pushed the AWT/bean/print changes to the jdk8/awt/tl repo.

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2012-February/002252.html

It looks like Stuart will take care of the ones going through jdk8/tl/jdk.

-Chris.


Contributed-by: Prasannaa<prasannaa...@yahoo.com>, Martijn Verburg
<martijnverb...@gmail.com>, Goerge Albrecht<goerge.albre...@gmx.net>,
Graham Allan<grundlefl...@googlemail.com>, Iordanis Giannakakis
<i.giannaka...@ymail.com>, Jose Llarena<jose.llar...@gmail.com>,
Abraham Marín Pérez<abraham.marin.pe...@gmail.com>

For all of the remaining code:

Contributed-by: Mani Sarkar<sadhak...@gmail.com>, Michael Barker
<mike...@gmail.com>, Carl Jokl<carl.j...@gmail.com>, Dinuk
Weerasinghe<dinu...@yahoo.com>, Markus Stoy
<markus.s...@timgroup.com>, Tom Anderson<tom.ander...@timgroup.com>

I hope these patches are providing value for the OpenJDK team as we
plan to do more.   I know that there is a bit of a cost for you guys
in terms of reviewing and merging.  I'm starting to get a better
picture of the type of changes that will go in smoothly and those that
will require updates to the patches.

Mike.

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Stuart Marks<stuart.ma...@oracle.com>  wrote:
Hi Mike,

I finally got back to this. These fixes look pretty good and knock off 100+
additional warnings! I've filed bug 7143230 [1] to track this. I took a look
through the code and I took the liberty of fixing up a few very minor
things:

1. Removed unnecessary casts to ZipEntry in JarVerifier.java, suggested by
Chirs Hegarty [2]. (These aren't strictly redundant casts, and don't cause
warnings, as the origin types are<? extends ZipEntry>  and JarEntry.
However, they are unnecessary.)

2. Fixed typo in unrelated comment at line 50 in SignatureFile.java that I
happened to notice.

3. Removed parentheses from expressions in MemoryMonitor.java lines 216, 219
which are now unnecessary since the cast has been removed.

No need to issue another patch; I'll just include these changes when I push
the changeset.

Which brings me to the topic that we discussed before when I pushed LJC's
previous round of warnings fixes, that is, how the Contributed-by line in
the commit message should be formatted. (See [3] for the requirements.) For
reference, here's what the changeset comment for the previous set of LJC
fixes ended up looking like:


changeset:   4802:4f0f9f9c4892
user:        smarks
date:        Wed Dec 07 12:12:50 2011 -0800
description:
7117249: fix warnings in java.util.jar, .logging, .prefs, .zip
Reviewed-by: alanb, dholmes, forax, sherman, smarks
Contributed-by: Prasannaa<prasannaa...@yahoo.com>, Martijn Verburg
<martijnverb...@gmail.com>, Goerge_Albrecht<goerge.albre...@gmx.net>,
Graham Allan<grundlefl...@googlemail.com>, Michael Barker
<mike...@gmail.com>


It looks like a different set of people contributed to this round of fixes.
If you could send me the list of names and email addresses, I can format
them into the commit message and push the fix.

Thanks!

s'marks


[1] http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7143230

[2]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2012-February/000715.html

[3] http://openjdk.java.net/guide/producingChangeset.html


On 2/4/12 12:12 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:

Thanks for this, looks great.

Good to see JarVerifier getting some much needed TLC.

-Chris.


On 02/ 4/12 07:50 AM, Michael Barker wrote:

I see Rémi has suggested a slice&  dice but I think that's a bit too much
work for the changes involved. Instead I would suggest a simple split,
send
the AWT/Printing/Beans changes to awt-dev + 2d-dev, and everything else
to
core-libs-dev.


Attached is the patch that contains "everthing else" from LJC warning
fixes hack session.

Mike.

Reply via email to