Yep, we do need a generic icon file for the OpenJDK distribution. It would be great if you could provide me with one.
On 24.05.2012, at 22:21, Jeff Hoffman wrote: > I need to do some research on this question... We should follow what has > been done before. It makes sense that we don't put Oracle branded images in > the OpenJDK distribution -- but I'm not exactly sure what we have been > putting in there up until now... If we need a "generic" icns file for the > Mac port, I can supply one. > > -jeff > > On 5/24/12 5:22 AM, Leonid Romanov wrote: >> I'm not sure whether Jeff Hoffman, who filed 7168062, is on the list, so I'm >> adding him to CC. Perhaps he would be able to comment on what repo the >> branded icon should go and what icon to use for the open tree. >> As for 7168062 not being visible to the outside world, there isn't much to >> see. It basically states "we should use branded icon instead what we use >> now" and that is. >> >> On 23.05.2012, at 19:41, Phil Race wrote: >> >>> On 5/23/2012 8:25 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: >>>>> That seems like overkill to me. Can't we just put the .icns in the JRE >>>>> (Contents/Home/jre/lib/images) and load it from there? What are we >>>>> guarding against by putting it into a .h file? >>>> OpenJDK will use Oracle icons ? Even for the community version ? >>> I was wondering about this too. It seems wrong. The icon, and/or the header >>> file >>> should be in "closed". We do not put branded images in the open tree, no >>> matter how its encoded since they aren't open source. >>> The openjdk should use something like the open source duke icon. >>> I am not sure I see how/where that works. >>> >>> BTW good luck seeing >>> >>>> Bug:http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7168062 >>> its marked for internal consumption only (for some reason I can't fathom). >>> >>> -phil. >>> >>> >>>
