Hi,
I've adressed your comments in 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~leonidr/7124239/webrev.01/
More specifically: 
1. Removed )
2. After some consideration I've decided to use timestamp in order to 
distinguish our event from others: seems like it's the most bulletproof method. 
3. You could be right. I've replaced the loop with NSConditionLock machinery.   

On 14.06.2012, at 19:12, Anthony Petrov wrote:

> Hi Leonid,
> 
> 1. In NSApplicationAWT: the NSLog("Here...") statements. I use such debugging 
> output, too! :) However, for production code please either replace them with 
> meaningful messages, or remove them altogether.
> 
> 2.
>> 344 - (void)sendEvent:(NSEvent *)event
> 
> I'm afraid that using the NSApplicationDefined and just skipping it may 
> conflict with other native toolkits, such as SWT, or some custom native 
> libraries. I think we should let such events go through the [super sendEvent].
> 
> 3. Isn't the loop in LWCToolkit.m too tight? There's an issue with 
> performSelector on the Mac in that selectors are processed strictly before 
> processing events. If the queue is flooded with posted selectors, the event 
> may never have a chance to be handled.
> 
> --
> best regards,
> Anthony
> 
> On 06/14/12 08:25, Leonid Romanov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Please review a fix for 7124239: [macosx] sun.awt.SunToolkit.InfiniteLoop 
>> exception in realSync called from SwingTestHelper.
>> The problem is that syncNativeQueue() doesn't fully sync the native queue. 
>> For example, if there are, say, 25 events in the native queue waiting to be 
>> processed, nativeSyncQueue might return after only one event has been 
>> processed. realSync() calls syncNativeQueue() in a loop until 
>> nativeSyncQueue() reports that no native events have been processed as the 
>> result of the call or the maximum number of iterations (which is 20) has 
>> been exceeded (which leads to the exception). And since there are more than 
>> 20 events in the native queue, we get the exception.
>> 
>> Bug:  http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7124239
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~leonidr/7124239/webrev.00/
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Leonid.

Reply via email to