*InputEvent.java: *I suppose it would be better to add code tag instead
of changes "&" in the code to &.
On 04.10.2013 17:38, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
Hi Anthony
I renewed this fix against your issues:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/jdk-8025236/webrev.01/
Thanks,
-Dmitry
01.10.2013 22:14, Anthony Petrov wrote:
You should only change the <code> issues in lines that are already
modified in your fix. No massive reformatting please.
And yes, the rest of the procedure is to publish the second version
of the webrev, and post a link to this mailing list.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 09/30/2013 05:52 PM, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
So, should I fix all the issues with this "<code>"'s, do webrev again
and send it to yan, and send it here again?
Thanks,
-Dmitry
27.09.2013 17:52, Anthony Petrov wrote:
The fix looks good to me. Again, if possible, I'd suggest to replace
<code> with {@code ..} if you're changing a line anyway.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 09/26/2013 06:21 PM, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
Hello, AWT Team.
Please review the fix for the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025236
The fix is available at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/jdk-8025236/webrev.00/
This is the fix for javadoc errors, on which doclint was showing some
issues.
The patch contains only simple markup fixes; no changes/fixes in
documentation text; the specification itself wasn't changed.
Thanks,
-Dmitry
--
Best regards, Sergey.
