Hello, Anthony. > I didn't make a line-to-line comparison, but overall the new code looks good > to me. Note that I'd leave the comment at old lines 176-179 as is for clarity. Ok, I'll return it back before the push.
> PS. I assume all clipboard tests pass after this fix. Most of the tests fail on Mac OS X even before the fix because of the bug I've originally tried to fix, but this change does not add any new failures. With best regards. Petr. On 18.03.2014, at 13:30, Anthony Petrov <anthony.pet...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Petr, > > I didn't make a line-to-line comparison, but overall the new code looks good > to me. Note that I'd leave the comment at old lines 176-179 as is for clarity. > > PS. I assume all clipboard tests pass after this fix. > > -- > best regards, > Anthony > > On 3/18/2014 12:17 PM, Petr Pchelko wrote: >> Hello, AWT Team. >> >> The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037560 >> The fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8037560/webrev/ >> >> Recently I've tried to fix our clipboard tests and make a proper >> implementation of the ClipboardOwner notifications on Mac OS X. >> However this appeared to be impossible without any over-complex solution due >> to Cocoa restrictions. By the way I've done a big >> clean-up of the Clipboard native code which would be a pity to throw away. >> So could you please review this clean-up fix. >> >> What I'm doing is replacing the selector-based invocations with block-based, >> so the source shrinks quite a lot. >> >> With best regards. Petr. >> >>