Sergey,
the fix still looks good to me.

--
Thanks,
Alexander.

25.12.2014 17:36, Sergey Bylokhov пишет:
Hi, Alexander.
On 25.12.2014 17:26, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
but I think it can be improved by saving robot instance to a static field (to avoid robot creation at every waitForIdle() call).
Make sense:
The new version:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8068275/webrev.02

--
Thanks,
Alexander.

25.12.2014 17:08, Sergey Bylokhov пишет:
Hello.
Please review a small fix for jdk 9.
The problem is in the Util.waitForIdle(Robot) which does not take into account that robot can be null.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068275
Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8068275/webrev.01





Reply via email to