Hi Chris,

> I suspect that these changes are best going directly into jdk9/dev, as 
> opposed to a a downstream forest.
Yes, they are going directly to jdk9/dev, I forgot to add the group, adding now.

> In may places '@library /lib/testlibrary ...' remains. Is this 
> redundant, in many tests? If so, it be removed.
No, this is mostly not redundant, as the jdk/testlibrary comntains many files 
specific for jdk only. Only a relatively small number of files are duplicated 
between hotspot and jdk.


>The changes are to the 'test' directory in the "top" repo? You are not 
>proposing to add a new repo, right?
No, we are not proposing a new repo. The changes are in the 'top' repo.

>test/lib/testlibrary/jdk/testlibrary/RandomFactory.java was updated 
>recently in jdk9/dev. The version in your webrev is a little out of date.
We are going to upmerge the changes then

>Is there any special update needed to jtreg to support this?
For thse changes no jtreg update is required.
However, there are plans for the jtreg to prohibit referencing any @libraries 
above the repo root unless such libraries are directly specified in 
TEST.properties
If jtreg thus prohibits  our using /../../test/lib (because it's above the 
root) we will have to additionally make a change to jdk and hotspot 
TEST.properties 

Best regards,
Alexander

Reply via email to