Hello Mike,
The following changes have been contributed during JDK Mac OS X port
developing:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/macosx-port/macosx-port/jdk/rev/9023fa7e47c9
src/macosx/native/sun/awt/AWTView.m
---------------------
+ if (dropTarget != nil)
+ dragOp = [dropTarget draggingEntered:sender];
+ else if ([super respondsToSelector:@selector(draggingEntered:)])
+ dragOp = [super draggingEntered:sender];
---------------------
May be you could know why it was necessary to check dragging* selectors
in super class when the super class is NSView which does not define them.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 10/8/2015 7:32 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Alexander.
I suggest to investigate why we try to call a methods of our parent
class when we know that these methods do not exist.
On 08.10.15 11:51, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
On 10/7/2015 5:38 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
On 10/7/2015 5:25 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I wonder, what is the reason for main/othervm in the test if it
starts a separate process anyway?
I do not have any particular reason to use it.
I removed the othervm option from the run tag:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8139050/webrev.01
Thanks,
Alexandr.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
--Semyon
On 10/7/2015 5:09 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
Could you review the fix:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8139050
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8139050/webrev.00
[super respondsToSelector:@selector(draggingEnded:)] always
returns true because AWTView instance responds to -draggingEnded:
selector.
The [[AWTView superclass]
instancesRespondToSelector:@selector(draggingEnded:)] should be used
instead.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
