On 12/24/2015 7:37 PM, Phil Race wrote:
On 12/24/2015 07:52 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
We use to add those fields usually but I don't see any obstacles to
make
the test anonymous. :)
The author of the test(and of any other files) can be tracked by the
hg history.
As someone who has maintained a lot of JDK code over the years I have
seen
files completely transformed such that the "author" had no hand in
what is left
except for the name of the file/class.
So I think tracking via 'hg' is much more honest about who did what than
asserting something about an entire file for all posterity and I would
not
add @author .. and don't think I ever have.
-phil.
I did know about this new convention. I just wondered because the most
tests I saw had such fields... Still no objections.
The updated fix looks good to me.
--Semyon
