Hi Alexandr,

 

AccelSurface is implemented by *ONLY* D3DSurfaceData and OGLSurfaceData classes,

Both of these classes extend SurfaceData as well.

Hence, casting of 'as' variable which is of type AccelSurface object to 
SurfaceData is always VALID.

 

Regards,
Prem

 

From: Alexandr Scherbatiy 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 4:42 PM
To: Prem Balakrishnan; Rajeev Chamyal; awt-dev@openjdk.java.net; Sergey Bylokhov
Subject: Re: Review Request: JDK-8144735 [hidpi] 
javax/swing/JWindow/ShapedAndTranslucentWindows/TranslucentPerPixelTranslucentGradient.java
 fails

 

On 8/17/2016 11:30 AM, Prem Balakrishnan wrote:



Hi Alexandr,

 

Thankyou for the review.

YES scaled SurfaceData returns proper scale values from 
getDefaultScaleX()/getDefaultScaleY(), which I have used in the current patch.

 

Please review the updated patch

HYPERLINK 
"http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epkbalakr/8144735/webrev.02/"http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/8144735/webrev.02/

  Is it always true that the 'as' variable which has type AccelSurface in the 
fix is always instance of SurfaceData?

  Thanks,
  Alexandr.



Regards,
Prem

From: Alexandr Scherbatiy 
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:06 PM
To: Prem Balakrishnan; Rajeev Chamyal; HYPERLINK 
"mailto:awt-dev@openjdk.java.net"awt-dev@openjdk.java.net; Sergey Bylokhov
Subject: Re: Review Request: JDK-8144735 [hidpi] 
javax/swing/JWindow/ShapedAndTranslucentWindows/TranslucentPerPixelTranslucentGradient.java
 fails

 

On 8/16/2016 7:35 AM, Prem Balakrishnan wrote:




Reminder

 

From: Prem Balakrishnan 
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 6:36 PM
To: Alexander Scherbatiy; Rajeev Chamyal; HYPERLINK 
"mailto:awt-dev@openjdk.java.net"awt-dev@openjdk.java.net; Sergey Bylokhov
Subject: RE: Review Request: JDK-8144735 [hidpi] 
javax/swing/JWindow/ShapedAndTranslucentWindows/TranslucentPerPixelTranslucentGradient.java
 fails

 

Hi Alexandr and Sergey,

 

Please review the updated patch.

HYPERLINK 
"http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epkbalakr/8144735/webrev.01/"http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/8144735/webrev.01/

>>"It is a little bit strange bug, because VolatileImage should handle this 
>>scale internally, and create double sized surface when necessary".-Sergey

Yes as you mentioned Volatile Image is getting scaled internally. Thanks for 
the feedback.

 

Cause: In  VIOptWindowPainter::updateWindowAccel(psdops, w, h) call, width and 
height were passed without scaling,
which was creating a bitmap of specified width and height, hence the output was 
clipped.


  I just have two general questions.
  - The scaled SurfaceData should return proper scales from 
getDefaultScaleX()/getDefaultScaleY() methods. Do these methods return right 
values after setting the scaled image sizes in the fix?
  - Region.clipScale() which is used in many places rounds values. The usual 
rule is to use Math.floor() for image coordinates rounding and Math.ceil() for 
sizes.
    Should the same rule be applicable here?

  Thanks,
  Alexandr.






 
 
Regards,
Prem

 

 

From: Alexandr Scherbatiy 
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 6:23 PM
To: Prem Balakrishnan; Rajeev Chamyal; HYPERLINK 
"mailto:awt-dev@openjdk.java.net"awt-dev@openjdk.java.net; Sergey Bylokhov
Subject: Re: Review Request: JDK-8144735 [hidpi] 
javax/swing/JWindow/ShapedAndTranslucentWindows/TranslucentPerPixelTranslucentGradient.java
 fails

 

On 8/3/2016 10:04 AM, Prem Balakrishnan wrote:

Hi,

Please review fix for JDK9,

 

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8144735  

 

Webrev: HYPERLINK 
"http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Epkbalakr/8144735/webrev.00/"http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pkbalakr/8144735/webrev.00/
 

 

 

Issue:

javax/swing/JWindow/ShapedAndTranslucentWindows/TranslucentPerPixelTranslucentGradient.java
 fails 

 

Cause:

While creating Transparent VolatileImage, width and height was NOT hidpi scaled.

 

Fix: VolatileImage width and height are scaled.


   I believe this is an issue in AWT and needs to be discussed on awt-dev alias.

   Should the backbuffer width and height be also scaled for the 
BIWindowPainter?

  Thanks,
  Alexandr.
 

 

Thanks,

Prem

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reply via email to