On 06/07/2018 01:13, Phil Race wrote:
Actually .. I've found that Component.java uses a relative link for
doc-files in all other cases.
I think that you should actually just remove the usage of @docRoot to
make it consistent.
It is more logical for this case.
In this method the "@docRoot" cannot be removed(it was added there
intentionally), because this method is overridden by some of our classes
where the relative link does not work.
-phil.
On 07/02/2018 10:16 AM, Phil Race wrote:
OK, +1
-phil.
On 07/02/2018 10:09 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 02/07/2018 09:29, Phil Race wrote:
Not exactly, it was after javadoc was changed under
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195795
So modules are added to the path.
This one seems to be different than the other two .. no mention of
the module
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8201611/webrev.00/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/imageio/metadata/IIOMetadataNode.java.udiff.html
The html tag <a> was replaced by the direct javadoc link to the java
class.
Why is it correct ?
-phil.
On 07/02/2018 09:11 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk11.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201611
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8201611/webrev.00
Some links in the javadoc became broken after modules were added.
--
Best regards, Sergey.
