John,

Thank you!  That is exactly what we were looking for.  We are new to 
Axapta and we are learning as we go.  You saved alot of headaches!

Rick
--- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Hans-Walter Bous 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Yifat,
> on the item (TAB PAGE References) you can set item coverage "Stop 
Explosion" to YES.
> As long as this is set you'll get a planned purchase order.
> John
> 
> Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> 
> There are 3 messages in this issue.
> 
> Topics in this digest:
> 
> 1. I_1626ITEMIDX
> From: "Stefan Heidkamp" 
> 2. RE : French Check Amount Naming
> From: "Steeve Gilbert" 
> 3. Re: Production - Items vs BOM
> From: "rickhardy22" 
> 
> 
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> 
> Message: 1 
> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:22:35 -0000
> From: "Stefan Heidkamp" 
> Subject: I_1626ITEMIDX
> 
> Hi all
> 
> we want to test with the standard database in 3.0 SP3. With the 
table 
> InventDimCombination we have a index-problem as stated below:
> 
> *Ja INVENTDIMCOMBINATION *ItemIdx 
> (I_1626ITEMIDX) ist nicht vorhanden
> 
> Nein -"- *ItemIdx Enthält 
> Duplikatdatensätze (nicht zulässig gemäß Index).
> 
> How can we solve this problem?
> 
> Many thanks in advance.
> 
> Stefan Heidkamp 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> 
> Message: 2 
> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:31:30 -0400
> From: "Steeve Gilbert" 
> Subject: RE : French Check Amount Naming
> 
> Yes, I'm in Quebec. That is a really detailed reply that explained 
a lot of things. Thanks a lot Jesper!
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Steeve... 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Jesper Kehlet [mailto:Axapta-Knowledge-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Jesper Kehlet
> Envoyé : 27 avril 2005 18:40
> À : Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
> Objet : RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] French Check Amount Naming
> 
> 
> 
> Steeve, you are right that there is no fix for this because it is 
not supported functionality in Axapta in the first place! You are 
not in France, but in Quebec, right?
> 
> 
> 
> The reason being that in France (Europe in general) most almost 
everybody is paying by direct, electronic bank transfers or giros, 
and not by check, so there was no need to develop this. Also, the 
french/Canada (fr-ca) language tribe is not supported by Microsoft 
in the first place. Support for french in Canada is actually the 
(different, slightly different, but still different) real french 
(fr), french/Belgium (fr-be) or french/Switzerland (fr-ch), which 
again are all european, and neither of them print checks. Actually 
check printing is only supported for USA, Denmark, Germany, UK, 
Spain and Mexico -- the US layout just happens to work for Canada, 
which is why it was release for Canada! 8-|
> 
> 
> 
> So what you are asking for is not supported by Microsoft. Axapta 
is not officially approved/released for the french speaking part of 
Canada, but since it is the VAR that determines if a customer is 
french or not, well...
> 
> 
> 
> So your deception should really only go towards your VAR, 
who "forgot" to tell you that Axapta hasn't been fully tested for 
french in Canada, only for english.
> 
> 
> 
> Je regrette d'être le porteur de mauvaises nouvelles.
> 
> _____ 
> 
> From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Steeve 
Gilbert
> Sent: Wed 4/27/2005 4:18 PM
> To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] French Check Amount Naming
> 
> Hi everyone!
> 
> 
> 
> We just found out that the amount in letter is not correct when 
printing check in french. Here's some exemple :
> 
> 
> 
> 4375,20 = Quatre Mille Trois Cent Soixante-dix Cinq et 20/100
> 
> Soixante-dix Cinq?
> 
> 
> 
> 992,74 = Neuf Cent Quatre-vingt-dix Deux et 74/100
> 
> Quatre-vingt-dix Deux?
> 
> 
> 
> 179,20 = Un Cent Soixante-dix Neuf et 20/100
> 
> Un Cent?
> 
> 
> 
> I've been told that there's no fix from Microsoft for this, is 
that true? Our VAR will install their fix (the fix they developed 
and had for a while. they knew about the problem but never told us 
until we found out... sorry... little rants here.) I just want to 
show my surprise and deception that there's no "official" fix and 
let other French language user know about the problem.
> 
> 
> 
> Bye!
> 
> Steeve... 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
> 
> 
> 
> _____ 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/
> 
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service . 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [This message contained attachments]
> 
> 
> 
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> 
> Message: 3 
> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:05:37 -0000
> From: "rickhardy22" 
> Subject: Re: Production - Items vs BOM
> 
> Yifat,
> 
> Thanks for your response. Yes, we want to be able to purchase and 
> produce an item. Right now we use master planning to determine 
what 
> to build and what to order. Our purchasing department goes to the 
> planned purchase orders in the AP section and manufacuring goes to 
> the Planned Production Orders in production. So since the item we 
> are talking about is a purchased item we want the demand to show 
up 
> in the planned purchase order section under purchasing - but if we 
> do that that then the item has to be a part and manufacturing can 
> not do a production order on it.
> 
> Your suggestion below sounds like what we want to do. How do you 
> tell an item that it should show up as a planned purchase order 
> rather than a planned production order? I think that would solve 
> our problem.
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
> --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, "yifath1" 
> wrote:
> > 
> > hi there,
> > 
> > Just an idea, why don't you set it up as a BOM, and in the 
planned 
> > orders you can change a planned production order to a planned 
> > purchase order. (you also have the ability to split the order 
> > quantity)
> > 
> > I don't know if I understand your concept completely, you want 
to 
> be 
> > able to purchase and produce an item. What is that about 
purchases 
> > department and manufacturing department, how do they currently 
> > decide what to purchase and what to manufacture?
> > 
> > Yifat
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, "rickhardy22" 
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > We have cases where we purcahse an item from a vendor and in 
the 
> > rare 
> > > case we may need to do some quality testing on it or do some 
> minor 
> > > modifications to it. We set the item up as an "item" in Axapta 
> > beaces 
> > > as demand shows up for the product our purchasing department 
> knows 
> > to 
> > > order more. 
> > > 
> > > The problem we are having is how can our manufacturing 
> department 
> > > schedle a production order on it if its an item? We could 
> switch 
> > it 
> > > to a BOM but then manufacuring would have to produce them 
rather 
> > than 
> > > them going directly to finished goods -and- how would 
purchasing 
> > know 
> > > to order more when needed.
> > > 
> > > Has anybody run into this before, and if so how did you solve 
> it? 
> > Any 
> > > help would be greatly appreciated.
> > > 
> > > Rick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
___
> 
> 
> Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>               
> ---------------------------------
> Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB kostenlosem Speicher





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Rcy2bD/UOnJAA/cosFAA/kGEolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Axapta-Knowledge-Village/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to