Thanks
Ben,
Anyone
any idea where this bug might be or whether there is a specific hotfix available
as I need to get it fixed asap and not sure if and when customer would agree to
a upgrade to SP4.
I know
this report calls a load of classes so it is not as simple as just looking for
the difference between Sp2 and Sp4 in one or two objects and applying that
unfortuantely....
Thanks
James
-----Original Message-----
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ben dover
Sent: 12 January 2006 04:50
To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Inventory value by dimension bugJames there is a bug on SP2, I am sure this is fixed in SP3 and above.
James Flavell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi
I am using Sp2 and find that when I run the inventory value by dimension
report for an item I get different results depending on whether I tick to
view the different dimensions. It seems when I view by warehouse and
location the result is wrong (i.e. qty is wrong) but viewing just by
warehouse or no dimensions gives the correct value!!!
I have killed my brain trying to find what is wrong but everything I have
checked looks correct....
I am wondering whether it is maybe somewhere the kernel converst the X++
into SQL code that it goes wrong but have no idea how to check this..
Would appreciate if anyone can let me know whether such a bug is known
and/o! r has been fixed in later SP or hotfixes....
Thanks
James
Yahoo! Photos
Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.
Sharing the knowledge on Axapta.
Visit www.frappr.com/axapta for axapta friends.
SPONSORED LINKS
Business finance course Business to business finance Small business finance Business finance consultant Business finance magazine Business finance schools
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Axapta-Knowledge-Village" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.