Nice one Fadi Karajeh !! Never thought of it this way!
   
  Allen.J

fadi karajeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
          Hi

You can issue an invoice for vertual customer (call it
lost items customer), and returm the items back when
ever you found them.

Hope that will help

With best regards
--- Allen Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello Satish,
> 
> Simple Solution: You can enhance the same solution
> by creating a report which displays the total Onhand
> (excluding the item Qty from 'LOSS' warehouse)
> 
> Open Risks to the above solution are:
> a). When you valuate inventory during period close
> etc., the item quantity from this warehouse would be
> considered.
> b). The above enhanced solution does not comply
> with best practices (there may be some hard coding
> involved).
> 
> A complete customised solution for this issue
> would be pretty expensive for your customer!!
> 
> Hope this helps! :)))))
> 
> Allen.J
> 
> 
> Satish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I want to remove lost items from my inventory, but
> retain the 
> flexibility to reverse the transaction in case the
> item is found again. 
> To do this I have setup a "LOSS" warehouse. Lost
> items are transferred 
> to this warehouse using a Transfer Journal.
> 
> However, when I query the On-hand qty for the item,
> it includes the qty 
> that is in the "LOSS" warehouse.
> 
> How can I exclude the qty in a particular
> warehouse(s) from the On-hand 
> calculation?
> 
> Any pointers would be welcome. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Satish
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for -
> Yahoo! Answers 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> 
> 

__________________________________________________________
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 


         



                                
---------------------------------
 Here’s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to