Thanks Varden / James, I will have a look more whats wrong in this instance, since usually recalc complete in 3 hours.
Thanks and best regards, Agus On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Varden Morris <vard...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Wow. It's a bit difficult to trace this way on the live system since > the code could be anywhere in the app. It's possible that a query is not > using the fields in the order of the index and since the kernel > automatically adds the DataAreaId to the WHERE clause you do not need > to specify it in code. > > *Varden Morris* > Varalth Solutions Inc. > 693 Abbottsfield Road NW > Edmonton, Alberta T5W 4R4 > Canada > (780) 752-0406 > www.varalth.com > > > *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE* > > > > This message and any attachments are confidential. If you have received > this transmission in error, please be advised that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or action taken in reliance upon this communication is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please > contact the sender immediately. Please note that any views or opinions > presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should > check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The > company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted > by this email. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Agus Riyadi <agusa...@gmail.com> > To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2009 9:22:32 PM > Subject: Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Create index with first column not > dataareaid > > > Thanks James, > > Yes perhaps this is not relevant to recalc/closing because there are users > activity during recalc which might get captured in the profiler too, and > profiler will not tell from which ax function this particular query comes > from. > I am just curious since DTA suggested several more indexes that have first > column not dataareaid. > My plan is to apply as many indexes as possible so then I can move forward > to others area for improvement if performance still unacceptable. > > Thanks and best regards, > > Agus > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:46 AM, James Flavell <djf1...@gmail. com> wrote: > > I would double check why is recalc/closing looking at custpackingslipjour . > As far as I am aware the std closing should not look at this table table so > I would be a little careful...although I guess you can add the index and see > but to me I would not expect any improvement in the recalc or closing > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Axapta-Knowledge- vill...@yahoogro ups.com > [mailto:axapta-knowledge-vill...@yahoogro > ups.com] On Behalf Of Agus Riyadi > Sent: 05 March 2009 11:33 > To: Axapta-Knowledge- vill...@yahoogro ups.com > > Subject: Re: [Axapta-Knowledge- Village] Create index with first column not > dataareaid > > > Hi Varden, > > Thanks for input. > This comes from the profiler file during inventory recalculation process, > so less likely that I will change the standard code. I will only add index > from the DTA's recommendation. > I think we need to concern the column order as suggested by DTA because > otherwise the index will not be used and only makes additional write > overhead. > So we can't do anything for this kind of suggestion, can we? > > Just FYI, I have a client who runs recalculation for long hours (20 + > hours). The only possibility is to tune the index because disk configuration > (RAID etc.) will not be change in the near future. > > Thanks and best regards, > > Agus > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Varden Morris <vard...@yahoo. com> wrote: > > You are right about the DataAreaId being added to the index by the kernel. > I am not sure that you need to concern yourself about the order of the > fields as suggested in the backend but you need to ensure that any query > coming from AX should have the fields listed in the WHERE clause in the > order in which they are listed in the index. In the case below, if there is > an index with the SalesId and RecId listed in that order then you should > ensure that all queries sent to the database, that will possible use this > index, have the fields in the WHERE clause listed in the same order. > > > CustPackingSlipJour : > salesid asc, > dataareaid asc, > recid asc. > > > Varden Morris > Varalth Solutions Inc. > 693 Abbottsfield Road NW > Edmonton, Alberta T5W 4R4 > Canada > (780) 752-0406 > www.varalth. com > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > This message and any attachments are confidential. If you have received > this transmission in error, please be advised that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or action taken in reliance upon this communication is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please > contact the sender immediately. Please note that any views or opinions > presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should > check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The > company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted > by this email. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Agus Riyadi <agusa...@gmail. com> > To: axapta-knowledge- village <Axapta-Knowledge- vill...@yahoogro ups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2009 12:27:29 AM > Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge- Village] Create index with first column not > dataareaid > > > > Dear all, > > Using sql server database engine tuning advisor, I got a recommendation to > add new index with the following scheme : > > CustPackingSlipJour : > salesid asc, > dataareaid asc, > recid asc. > > Is it possible to achieve that in Ax ? As far as I know Ax always add > dataareaid column as the first column of any index created from AOT. > > Thanks and best regards, > > Agus > > > > > > >