Paul Sokolovsky a écrit : > Hello Pierre, > > Thursday, February 22, 2007, 9:06:07 PM, you wrote: > >> Thanks for your help Patrick ! >> I will keep you informed of my OE adventures ;-) > > What Patrick didn't do is to post announcement that aximx50 machine > was accepted in OE.dev.
Great piece of news ! It will make further dev easier. > > Btw, angstrom*.conf hacking is strictly optional, there's local.conf > to keep any local changes. > >> BTW, I just upgraded Axim X50 Wiki pages to the current HH template. Of >> course, feel free to improve it. > >> I took the freedom to move PCMCIA/CF support to 'A' level, because it >> does not seem so important in the X50 case. > > That's called "cheating" ;-). The common template was introduced > exactly to compare state of *different* ports. Well, after all, ports > maintainers are who'd blush if they announce port as pretty working, > but users find that basic things don't actually ;-) Well, sorry that you see that choice like cheating. To be level x or y does not matter in my mind : we are not selling anything ;-) The idea was more to identify the global useability of the system, and the meaning of this useability may depend on the system type. But ok to follow the common rules. I am going to fix it now. > >> So for now, X50/X51(v) (at least X51v in fact) is level 'C'. To those of >> you guys who have a X50, X50v or X51, please help us to remove each '?' >> in this table. > >> Pierre > > [] > -- _______________________________________________ Aximx50-port mailing list [email protected] https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/aximx50-port
