I like your thoughts. I have an axim x50, not the x50v. I can only help with testing but will help when it's needed.
Chew ------- Original message ------- From: Joe Belford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 5.5.'08, 8:57 > The thought is to start with the android kernel google has released (based on > 2.6.23) and patch it with the required modules for the axim. It will also > need to be patched to remove the qemu goldfish support and fix the arm > support. but you're right, from the current HH kernel you would only require > a part of the code. Although, I'm thinking it would be easier to get > everything working with the current HH builds, and then worry about moving it > to android. As for the bootloader, my thought is to continue using haret for > the time being. My idea for this is not so much using the axim as a pda but > to make it into an iPod touch like device. > > -Joe > > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Paul Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would I be wrong in thinking that only a small part of the code would be > needed to boot android. > I'm not great with these things but isn't android fully contained? > Aren't they called bootstraps that load an OS? > > Chew > > ------- Original message ------- > From: Joe Belford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 4.5.'08, 9:55 > > > I'm actually looking at this port as a starting point to load the google > > android platform. I think that could be a great use for this paperweight > > that's otherwise not being used. As I mentioned, I wanted to make sure I > > could even get the framebuffer issue right on the X50 before I started. > > Now that it seems to be working, I'm going to take a look at any other > > outstanding issues before I even look towards android. > > > > -Joe > > > > On May 4, 2008, at 12:16 AM, Carl Kynaston wrote: > > > > I am still here. I would love to see some updates on this port. :) > > > > Carl > > > > Paul Allen wrote: > > I also got your message. > > > > Chew > > ------- Original message ------- > > From: Angel Sánchez Morales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: 3.5.'08, 12:27 > > > > > > > > I'm still here too :p > > > > Scott Duensing wrote: > > > > > > Received your message here. List has been pretty quite though. > > > > Scott > > > > > > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Joe Belford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Is this mailing list still being used? I'm not sure but it seems as though > > my messages do not post. I've been doing some work on the x50 framebuffer > > problem and I think I have it fixed but I'd like someone else to take a look > > at it. > > > > Thanks, > > Joe > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Aximx50-port mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/aximx50-port > > > > > > > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Aximx50-port mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/aximx50-port > > > > > > > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Aximx50-port mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/aximx50-port > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Aximx50-port mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/aximx50-port > -- _______________________________________________ Aximx50-port mailing list [email protected] https://www.handhelds.org/mailman/listinfo/aximx50-port
