On May 21, 2005 10:00 PM William Sit wrote: > ... > For example: > >(26) -> )lisp (|parseAndInterpret| "expand((1+x)^10)::OutputForm") > > (26) > 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 > x + 10x + 45x + 120x + 210x + 252x + 210x + 120x + 45x + 10x + 1 > Type: OutputForm > ... > You want two lines: > > 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 > > and > > x + 10x + 45x + 120x + 210x + 252x + 210x + 120x + 45x + 10x + 1
Yes, that's it exactly. > Back to the drawing board. > > The print command in Axiom always returns void. Wouldn't that > mean one has to intercept the side-effect of printing? But that > can happen anywhere in the code. Right? Well I am assuming (without checking deeply in the code) that although creating the OutputForm is distributed throughout the algebra code, rendering of the OutputForm as 2-dimensional text by this thing called CHARYBDIS, is likely done in only one place. My hope is that the 2-d array of characters is available internally in it's entirety, before it is sent to stdout, line- by-line. This is what I need to send to the http stream, along with other things required by the hypertext protocol. > Would it be easy to write a Java script to parse the prefix > lisp output string in Value? This can then take care of the > window width as well. Well yes, I like your approach to returning latex output. > A better way for TeX output: > >(18) -> )lisp (|parseAndInterpret| "tex(integrate(sin(x),x)::TexFormat)") > > (18) ["-{\cos \left( {x} \right)}"] > Type: List String > Value = ((|List| (|String|)) WRAPPED "-{\\cos \\left( {x} \\right)}") I think I can use that in at least a limited way, although it would be nicer if I did not have to wrap the command in tex( ... ::TexFormat) and even better if this would work for multi-line input of the sort one can process by )read file.input But I don't think that using Java script in the browser to parse the "prefix lisp output string" would be that practical. As I understand it that would amount to re-implementing CHARYBDIS on the browser side in java which is beyond the level of effort that I was hoping for. If one was to attempt something on this scale, I think it would be better to go directly to MathML based on the prior NAG work on openmath. Or as an interim approach, via LaTeX code, calling latex and dvipng as external program to obtain a graphic result. Regards, Bill Page. _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer