Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But as far as I know, for Aldor this situation was abstracted and there is > > now > > a keyword for dealing with it, I believe it is "extend". > > Right. If you look at the sources of libaldor it starts with > lib/aldor/src/lang/sal_lang.as and then lib/aldor/src/base/sal_base.as. > > Interestingly, in the latter file there is some interdependency.
> [...] > But obviously, the Aldor compiler can handle this. great! > Should I know debugsys? no. It is (scarcly..) described in "developernotes", I think. > > Without OUTFORM, you can print using the Lisp function "print". > > But how does the Interpreter show the result? Doesn't it rely on the fact that > a domain satisfies CoercibleTo(OutputForm)? yes. > For example, if you write a file > > ---MyInt.spad > )abbr domain MYI MyInt > MyInt: with > x: % > == Integer add > x: % == 1 > ---END > > Then > )co MyInt.spad > x:MyInt > > it prints just Type: Void but no other output. yes, this is what I'd expect. Well, not quite. I'd expect Type:MyInt... > So in order to have a reasonable input/output behaviour on the Axiom command > line, I should meet certain criteria. Look at outform.spad and out.spad. (I think the latter answers your question) Martin _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
