Hi Ralf. > what do you want to say by your comment? I want to say that tla/GNU arch is not at all looking good as a source control system (it's problematic on Windows and looks like it is barely alive as an on-going project) and I would suggest dropping it as a tool for the Axiom project.
I am perturbed by the splitting of the Axiom effort into separate Arch source trees/sub-projects which seem not to be able to remerge (due apparently to lack of developer time and/or interest) and which are presumably becoming more divergent from the core CVS source repository due to ongoing bitrot. I realise that you were writing with respect to a more specific issue, but your recommendation prompted me to write in respect of the more general issue of the Axiom source code control system. For that reason I changed the topic of the thread. I further say that the multiplicity of unresolved source control systems and sub-projects in the Axiom project is just one sign of what is looking more and more like an overgrown and somewhat choked garden to me. I'm actually rather a fan of overgrown gardens, but I do like to feel that I can walk through them to get at the flowers without falling into a well. Cheers Mike Thomas. _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
