Hi, On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:28:09AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > | > It is good to have unstable branch where experiments are > | > conducted.
> | > but I think we need one branch that is unstable but not too unstable. > | > | That's a good point. It sounds like a three stage system. > | > | A golden branch that will be the stable version. (axiom--main--1) > | A silver branch that will be the almost stable branch (that is where you > | opted for maintaining) > | Several experimental branches, where one person (or a group of people) > | agrees on how they do development until the experiment becomes > | resonably stable to be ready for the silver branch. > | > I'm willing to take responsability for that, but I need general > | > agreement from the community (especially from Tim) for having that > | > sort branch with the intent that patches applied there will move to > | > the stable branch when they have survived enough testing and satisfy > | > The Master (Tim!) taste. This is somewhat the Linus Torvalds / Andrew Morton approach for developing the Linux kernel. > There are tools to convert CVS repositories to SVN ones; I don't know > whether similar tools exist for converting tla archive to SVN. The See Tailor: http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/Tailor How hard is it to settle a public subversion server? Do you have access to the appropriate hosting resources? Best regards, Frederic (still believing that patches matter more than the tools) http://lehobey-rennes.dyndns.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=doc:veille:gestion_de_code_source _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
