"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:12 AM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > | > Tim Daly (root) writes: | > | > | yep. it turns off the "tail recursion" noise. bill schelter | > | and i worked on creating tail recursion in AKCL. This was | > | just a debugging message at the time. For some reason it | > | outlived its useful life and continues in the current code | > | base. the message "exposes" lisp to the user of the axiom | > | interpreter so i removed it. | > | > Tim, | > | > Is there a reason why this code should not be contributed back | > to GCL so that we don't have to patch GCL all the time? | > | | As far as I know this patch is irrelevant
Great! I'm preparing a patchlet to remove its application to the silver branch. | since the message is controlled by the GCL switch | | (setq compiler::*suppress-compiler-notes* t) | | http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gcl-devel/2003-09/msg00189.html | http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gcl-devel/2003-09/msg00195.html What happened to that proposal to Camm? That message seems to have received no public answer... | Note that the patch is not used on Debian. That is good. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer