Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| But of course, I could live with that identification if it is clearly | documented that ()->Cat can be identified with Cat. Where are our | category experts? I believe there is a distinction here, n'est pas? >From Category Theory point of view, a constant x of type T is the same as the (unique) morphism x : 1 -> T, where 1 is the one-point set. Now, I also understand that beyond the name, Aldor's catagories are not mathematical categories; so.... My practice of functional programming suggests that the identification is useful in many cases, than keeping the artifice. But YMMV. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
