Hello,
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:21:03 +0200, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree, .asy or Foam is better than C or LISP, for what you are
considering. But Ralf considered looking into the compiler sources. The
discussion has now drifted towards "I do not need the sources; I simply
compile to <some Language> and get the required information by mysolf".
Thereby, I guess you are barking up the wrong tree.
I might mention that the lisp output would be significantly easier
to parse and maintain.
If you pursue the "I do not need the sources; I simply compile to <some
Language> and get the required information by myself" idea, I'd still
think asy or Foam are better than LISP or C.
Obviously, C is worst solution, as it is hard to parse.
But asy, foam, asd LISP files are all more or less in LISP syntax. And asy
and foam even use only a proper subset of the langauge. And the needed
inforamiotn is presented more adequately IMHO.
You want a simple parser. I fully agree. But parsing asy or foam is
probably even easier than parsing LISP.
--
Kind regards,
Christian
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer