> > Should we limit commits to only one file at a time? > > I would say so, since we might accept some changes and reject others. It > is easier to pick the stuff if you have per-file-commits. I believe that > it is a bit hard to submit changesets through the webinterface. But it > should be required to add a reason for the change and that reason should > become an svn-log.
The philosophical difference between CVS and SVN is the idea of changesets. In CVS it is not possible, except thru elaborate tagging, to associate a set of changes of multiple files to a single idea. Axiom uses changesets in arch as a substitute for tagging. However it would make more sense to use changesets in svn since it would make it possible to apply a single change to many files (eg, to update all the makefiles for one global change). this change might add a feature and be completely independent of every other change even though it changes multiple files. Limiting commits to one file at a time makes SVN equivalent to CVS. t _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
