Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jay Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | ... > | > Someone, peopel seems to interpret allowing Axiom to be built if latex > | > is not present as making Axiom non-literate. > | > | (Some "if"s, I know.) > | If being built refers to being built by people who might make changes > | (others will eventually use pre-built binaries, I would guess) and if > | part of literate programming is being able to produce nice typeset > | documentation, wouldn't building without typesetting encourage > | literate bit-rot? > > Jay, > > Why don't you register at SF
I am registered at SF; I'm belanger there. > and fix the build environment so that you can report on testings I don't know what that would involve, but I'd be happy to look into it. > if you believe that Axiom should not be allowed in build > environement without latex? I don't have any beliefs in the matter. I was asking what I thought was an important question which I didn't see addressed in this thread. Jay _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
