Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > We are already using 4 different source code control systems in | > the Axiom project (CVS, ARCH, SVN, DARCS) and no one is entirely | > happy with any one of them, so what's the harm in considering | > yet another? :-) | | Gaby uses SVK to access our SVN archive. ;-)
Indeed. How many active developers do we have? How many VCS do we use? I'm quite happy with SVN+SVK. It is a pity SF's server is such a pain in the ass to work with. :-( | Seriously, who is using CVS? Should we consider to drop keeping the | CVS archive(s) in sync with GOLD? Should we drop CVS support? This | synching process is needless work in my eyes... and we don't have so | much resources. it looks like we are more effective at replicating the base source code in many VCS than actually moving it forward :-/ (that includes me) -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
