"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| Let's us Tim's suggested terminology. "Shoe" is the newer version | of Boot in the boot directory, while "Boot" is the older version | of Boot in the interp directory. | | My suggestion was to eliminate the source in boot directory | (thus remove Shoe) and use the same method as in the CMUCL build | starting from Boot in the interp directory. Thanks to Tim's analysis | we now know that this would amount to removing the incomplete attempt | to move to a newer version of the BOOT language implied in Shoe. | | I would still argue that this is a good idea. I'm very skeptical that removing "shoe" is a good idea. I wouold think it sends us back to less high-level code. I would prefer to eliminate "old" boot; but that is not something I have a plan for in the immediate future. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
