> > Although noweb implements three of four features I don't see it as a
> > requirement. Indeed there has been discussion of other formats such as
> ...
> > * latex macro forms which replace the <<>> syntax with
> > \begin{chunk}{chunkname}, not yet public.
>
> Can one infer that there is (the beginnings of) one which is private?
yes. i'm learning a lot about the tex language so it's taking time.
latex does similiar processing to handle bibligraphic and index files.
if latex can do code chunks directly, format them properly in
a latex document and dump the code to a file there is no need
for any other tool.
t
_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
